Talk:Corncob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what part of the plant is this?[edit]

Can't we have this mentioned for all foods eg carrot is a root so this should be mentioned on the page, similarly for this food too (cob). Charles.2345 (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ureferenced and WRONG[edit]

One sentence in the first part of the article gets it right. The cob is the inner part of an ear of corn. The Captions on the photos are/were wrong. They are not corn cobs. They show ears of corn. --Aflafla1 (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ping User:Aflafla1, finally fixed the photo-captions, per WP:NORUSH.  :-)     Also found some sources for about half of the industrial-usage-section, please see below. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The images I added were different from the ones Aflafla1 was questioning. — Earwig talk 20:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I figured.  :-)     Also, I'm not positive that every dialect of English uses "corn cob" in exactly the same fashion... I have only ever heard the ones with kernels-still-attached called ears of corn, or more simply, corn. But at least one of the refs I found below, spoke of corncobs when speaking of the kernels-of-corn-still-attached-to-the-cob state of the plant. Maybe it is a regional variation, or maybe Canadian/British/Australian dialect uses the terminology slightly differently? In any case, I think the photos and captions are now reasonably non-wrong, at present. Good work. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 07:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine to me. I don't have a reference, nor did I add the statement, but I will confirm that corn cobs can be used as a mild abrasive. It is quite suitable for removing lichen from stonework. Aflafla1 (talk) 01:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sources[edit]

These are just a smattering. There are at least half a dozen hits on google scholar with triple-digit cite-counts about the various uses of corn cobs, industrial and agricultural.

p.s. As a linguistic note, corncobs are the part which is left after you pull the ears off the cornstalks, husk them of surrounding leaves, and remove the corn-kernels. You end up with a short somewhat-thick dowel-shaped object, which has a "foam-filled" central cylindrical core. The cob is not edible, except as a fiber-additive to cattle feed or somesuch. Humans eat the corn-kernels. When eating corn on the cob, the leftover thing inside the corn-kernels, is the corn cob. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]