This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Danbeam42, Cam Mart, Edgarrange (article contribs).
Coors strike and boycott is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the July 2021 good article nominations backlog drive! Any section that I've marked with a Working tag means that I haven't finished leaving comments there, but you're free to begin making changes as soon as you see them! Kncny11(shoot) 14:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Use the {{short description}} template at the top to give a quick description of the event – something like, "20th century labor action against Coors Brewing Company"
"In 1979, both the American GI Forum and the Mexican American Political Association (a California-based organization)" → "In 1979, botht he American GI Forum and the California-based Mexican American Political Association"
In February 1987, the AFL–CIO rejected an offer put forward by Coors, but later that year, on August 19, they announced an end to the boycott after reaching an agreement with the company. → The AFL–CIO rejected Coors' initial offer in February 1987, but on August 19, they announced that they had come to an agreement with the company and would be ending their boycott.
Done.
Use an en dash rather than a hyphen for the Tasini quote, you can use the template –
In the second and third sentence, change all instances of the % symbol to the word "percent", per MOS:PERCENT
Done.
However, these numbers and the impact the boycott had on the decline is disputed by company representatives. The placement of this sentence is not intuitive, as it's immediately followed by a sentence where they admit that the boycott played a role. Maybe after the LA Times quote is better
"several highlighting" → "several of which highlighted"
Done.
If I'm reading it properly, that the "targeting the community" phrase is in relation to the advertisements, then the section in parentheticals should be moved to after the word "community"
Pictures are all available for use and are relevant to the article
No stability problems present
Earwig copyvio score checks out at 37.1%, with the highest percentages due to attributed direct quotations
Broadness, focus, and neutrality all check out
Great job so far! Mostly just some nitpicky things for flow, as well as some of our less intuitive manual of style guidelines (the percentage one always throws me, too). The only other general comment I would make is that there are a lot of parenthetical comments here, and if those can be worked into the flow of the sentence, that usually looks better from an encyclopedic perspective. I noted at least one example above. Let me know if you have any questions, and I'll put this on hold to allow comments to be addressed! Kncny11(shoot) 17:58, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kncny11, just wanted to reach out and let you know I addressed your comments here and think the page should be good to go now. Thanks for starting this review, and if there are any further comments or concerns, feel free to reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks all good on my end. Happy to pass! Kncny11(shoot) 03:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Danbeam42, Cam Mart, Edgarrange (article contribs).
Working tag means that I haven't finished leaving comments there, but you're free to begin making changes as soon as you see them! Kncny11 (shoot) 14:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
