Talk:Constructivism (psychological school)

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Start‑class Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs non-cryptic writing, e.g., replace "to language" with something a non-specialist would understand[edit]

I don't know what the verb "to language" means and I doubt 99.9% of the people you're trying to explain this to would. Could you choose another verb or explain the meaning of this neologism please? Or is constructivism some kind of cult with its own secret language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.230.245.20 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2008‎ (UTC)[reply]

Could we get a non-circular definition?[edit]

"In psychology, constructivism concerns the world of constructivist psychologies."

Could that be replaced with a non-circular explanation?

The rest of article also needs rewriting into prose accessible by someone not already familiar with the subject matter.

Ocdnctx (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]