Talk:Compulsory trade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge with Voluntary trades[edit]

Each term only makes sense when contrasted to the other; the article on voluntary trades has more information about compulsory trades than about voluntary trades. PamD 21:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I agree -- the term compulsory trades makes for at least the beginnings of a stub article. The term voluntary trades could essentially be boiled down to "everything else". WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for both reasons above. Little Will (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, I don't see a need to separate the subjects into two articles. PKT(alk) 16:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Klbrain (talk) 21:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]