Talk:Collaborative fiction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former good article nomineeCollaborative fiction was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 21, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Merge from wikinovel[edit]

I think these are two related but somewhat distinct topics. A wikinovel is a form of collaborative fiction, but a distinct one. The two sites should be linked.

unfit part[edit]

The commercial writing part was out of theme, as it was centered on couples of writers and mentioning irrelevant authors. It was hence moved, and shortened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.170.108.246 (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collaborative fiction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about Fantômas?[edit]

This character was an example of collaborative fiction that perhaps deserves a mention, since he first appeared way back in 1911, and starred in 32 books between then and 1914, a phenomenal output made possible by the fact that two people were simultaneously writing each book. He was at the time enormously popular, was considered iconic by the Surrealist Movement, starred in several multi-part silent movie serials, and was undoubtedly far more significant than some of the works you mention simply because they had two or more authors - 32 novels beats a short story if you ask me!

The two men who wrote the books used the bizarre method of discussing the plot of the novel for a few hours, then going off and independently writing half each, one doing the odd-numbered chapters and the other the evens. Six weeks later they would meet up, each read what the other had written, and write the last chapter together, hopefully uniting the two schizoid plot-threads in a satisfactory way. After one of them died in 1914, a further 11 novels were written by the remaining half of the team, but despite being much more coherent than what had gone before, it was generally agreed that they weren't as good.

If anybody actually reads these comments, you might consider updating the article to include these facts, which you can check in your own "encyclopedia", if you consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source (strangely, many people don't). I know you don't think fictional characters from earlier times matter unless they've had a passing mention in "The Simpsons", but Fantômas is explicitly the direct ancestor of a major character in "The Venture Brothers" which is near-as-dammit! 86.144.29.22 (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]