Talk:Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I don't have a source at hand, but I've read that Sihanouk actually left the coalition in 1987 or 1988, after talks with the pro-Vietnam administration. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 15:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sihanouk resigned in early 1988 so that he could engage in discussions with Hun Sen which were brokered by France and the Soviet Union, as per Elizabeth Becker in When the War was Over,. Thanks for pointing this out; worth including. Cmacauley (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disorienting Acronyms[edit]

The use of all these acronyms is confusing, for the right wing rebel groups can we designate the term royalist and nationalist before the acronym to designate the faction the body is part of. --J intela (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

Fixed the citation needed, which was rightly added as the comment turned out to be dead wrong. I changed the paragraph around a bit to fit what the references said. Drunkenduncan (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, thanks! Cmacauley (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of real territorial control[edit]

Should the article stress even more that this "government" actually governed nothing; it had international recognition but no real control of the country on the ground? I realize that this is pretty much the definition of a "government in exhile" but the concept is probably not particularly familiar to younger readers as there are generally far fewer of them now that there were 50-75 years ago. 2600:1004:B15F:1925:596A:5C92:BAB3:151C (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UN General Assembly Votes about KR and CGDK seat in UN[edit]

"91 rejected the proposal, there were 29 countries in favour and 26 abstentions. In contrast, the results in 1981 had been 77–37–31" The UN votes for this article seem to contradict the article of Democratic Kampuchea which states "The UN General Assembly voted by a margin of 71 to 35 for the KR to retain their seat at the UN, with 34 abstentions and 12 absentees."

I am unfortunately unable to access the sources listed to double check the statistics and am currently searching online for a suitable source. Is anyone able to fact check these stats? Dafatskin (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]