Talk:Chuck E. Weiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Missing Albums[edit]

This fails to meantion his first album "The other side of town" from 1981 which is out of print and features dr john. and doesnt mention his new album red beans and weiss

Living in a room without leaving[edit]

How could he spent his life in a single room without leaving when - at the same time - he played in a house band (where he met Tom Waits). Could somebody please check these statments? --Vertigo Man-iac (talk) 12:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

house band Ebbetts Field[edit]

(they met in 1974 at Ebbetts Field, where Weiss played in the house band)[2] - this is false ("house band") Ebbetts Field NEVER had a "house band" and to my knowledge, Chuck E never played there once as a headliner or opening act, unless he might have sat in with Waits. Ebbetts Field featured national headliners on the way up (e.g. The Outlaws, Lynyrd Skynyrd) and never featured a local "house band." Often different local acts were allowed to play an opening set before the headliner. I know, as a "local" I went there all the time. Chuck E DID hang there a lot. One night in 1975 as we were leaving the stage at Ebbetts Field (we opened for Jimmy Buffett) and headed for the dressing room, we almost tripped over Chuck E and Tom Waits, who were on their knees on the hallway floor rolling dice. Also, at the referred [2} citation, there is no mention of a "house band" with Chuck E in it. I recommend this "house band" line be removed. It is myth, untrue, and unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davequ (talkcontribs) 22:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Levi and the Rockats[edit]

Levi Dexter's band was The Rockats, not the Rockettes.

http://www.punkglobe.com/levidexterinterview0610.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.50.153.147 (talk) 23:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Letterman gig[edit]

   I took an interest in his bio bcz of his appearance as the musical guest, at the end of a Letterman show earlier this year. My recollection, whose accuracy i am not confident about, is that they broadcast about 4 identical choruses and no verses; to the extent that i trust that impression i have two theories, both presupposing that they booked him, and he turned out to want to do "(Just like) Boston Blackie", whose verses are at least a little strong for broadcast TV:

  1. There was a you-can't-say-that-on-TV confrontation, with Weiss saying "There's nothing in the contract about what i'd sing, and i'm fulfilling it by showing up and being willing to sing this particular one of the songs i've previously released", to which CBS perhaps replied "Fine, we'll record it live on our stage", but decided "He's being an asshole, screw him! We'll cut all the verses; his fans will still enjoy hearing the chorus, but we'll make him look like a fool to our main demographic, for singing choruses and no verses."
  2. They were entirely happy with what the studio audience heard live, and they had known they'd have to reduce the length for broadcast; and Standards and Practices said "Sorry, none of the verses is acceptable in full". Rather than chop up -- and perhaps juxtapose parts of -- different verses, to fill the proper length of 2 or 3 verses, we'll just limit all the verses to the live performance, and repeat what is still a fine chorus in spite of the repetition; he's a professional and he'll understand that it doesn't always work out perfectly."

   On the other hand, perhaps i was just spaced out by the long repetitive portions and didn't really register the somewhat nonsensical verses even if they (or some of them) were broadcast.
   I tried searching for comments on the broadcast, to no avail; perhaps someone who recorded it or already knew the whole song can verify whether it was significantly butchered or not -- assuming that there's some kind of "there" there, i.e., something worthy of mention in his bio or in an article on the song, its references, etc.
   Oh, i didn't register the fact that it's a brand new release from this spring.
   I'm adding reference to Boston Blackie, the century-old stories.
--Jerzyt 13:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck E. Weiss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was[edit]

Was? Is he gone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.48.246.188 (talk) 17:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, afraid so. He was 76, so no real surprise. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]