Talk:Chris Brown (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

  • Excuse me this is not a message page to talk to Chris Brown . It is to talk about the Chris brown article. So I am removing all the "talk to" Chris Brown messages. Shinemygrillz 01:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can the Umbrella remix be an unreleased track from this album? Let's think about this logically. Chris Brown releases an album in 2006. This means that he would have recorded the songs before this date. In 2006, Rihanna was still recording 'A Girl Like Me'. Therefore, Umbrella could not have been recorded yet. Thus, it is theoritically impossible that Umbrella (remix) was to be placed on this album. Does everyone agree? Thankyou --58.104.185.153 07:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Chris Brown album has sold 1.4 million US according to soundscan.com, please change it.

"Run It" hit number #1 in Aus and the US. Good work. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 19:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Runitchrisbrown.jpg[edit]

Image:Runitchrisbrown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Brown (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opening discussion on vandalism, cherrypicking and editorial bias on this article[edit]

There is a pattern of blatant vandalism and cherrypicking on this article whereby conseriable sourced content is being removed without justification or any sound explination. Moreover, cherrypicking is being done to selectively highlight only negative reception, thereby violating WP:NPOV. It's quite sad to see this kind of editorial biased, which is consistent with the editorial bias present on other album articles of said artist. Failure to provide justification for all these changes on this talk page will result in the article being reverted to its prior state before the vandalism occured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Instantwatym (talkcontribs)

@Instantwatym: Do you refer to this removal of unsourced allegations that claim that the album was praised by multiple sources, but their websites link to the main pages and not to the alleged praise publications? The same websites and links you added back in January? Please, explain yourself. (CC) Tbhotch 19:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]