Talk:Child Welfare League of America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Child Welfare League of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kidnapping?[edit]

In her essay in The Atlantic, "Margaret Atwood Bears Witness", Sophie Gilbert refers to "the kidnapping of indigenous children by the Child Welfare League of America" as an established fact. She was referring to their “The Indian Adoption Project“ The project ran from 1958 to 1967. In June 2001, Child Welfare League Executive Director Shay Bilchik legitimated Native concerns, formally apologizing for the Indian Adoption Project at a meeting of the National Indian Child Welfare Association. He put the Child Welfare League of America on record in support of the Indian Child Welfare Act. “No matter how well intentioned and how squarely in the mainstream this was at the time,” he said, “it was wrong; it was hurtful; and it reflected a kind of bias that surfaces feelings of shame.” A description of the program is detailed at Bascom, Karen (2007). "The Logic of Exchange: The Child Welfare League of America, The Adoption Resource Exchange Movement and the Indian Adoption Project, 1958–1967". Adoption & Culture. 1 (1): 5–67. JSTOR 44755459. and Briggs, Laura (2012). "The Making of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 1922-1978". Somebody's children: the politics of transracial and transnational adoption. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822394952-003. ISBN 978-0-8223-5147-4.. For greater context see, for example: Graham, Lorie M. (1998). ""The Past Never Vanishes": A Contextual Critique of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine". American Indian Law Review. 23 (1): 1–54. It would seem to me that mention of this program would be appropriate in this article. --Bejnar (talk) 19:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is the lead paragraph too promotional ?[edit]

Is the lead paragraph too promotional? Phrases such as "the trusted authority for professionals" and "unique access and influence" seem that way to me. Much of it reads like a brochure written by CWLA PR staff. Would anyone like to rewrite it, or shall I? --Bejnar (talk) 15:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]