Talk:Chilabothrus exsul

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Chilabothrus exsul is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Move proposal[edit]

Would anyone be opposed to moving this article to "Epicrates exsul", in line with the rest of the articles in this series? --Jwinius (talk) 09:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've made the move myself. JoJan (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, that was fast! I hope you don't catch any flack for doing that so fast, though. It's happened to me before, so I've learned to be a little more patient now than I have been in the past. But, we'll see how things go. Eventually, I'd like to get this section, Boidae, looking like the other snake sections, such as Pythonidae (the article format, the categories for the articles, common names and synonyms). What do you think? --Jwinius (talk) 21:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and be bold. Anything, and certainly uniformity, to improve these articles is welcome. You look certainly the man with enough expertise to do it JoJan (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case I could use your help, seeing as there is a little resistance here and there (and perhaps more to come). Basically, I used these lists -- List of boine species and subspecies and List of erycine species and subspecies -- checked all the articles for common names (32, including Boa), found 14 candidates (including Boa) and left move proposals on the associated talk pages. So far there has been opposition in only two cases, but I've learned that I should wait at least three days in these matters, so that number could still grow. You could help enormously simply by adding your voice of support to the various move proposals. I'd certainly appreciate it. Cheers, --Jwinius (talk) 10:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to, but I'm up to my ears in work writing a biography of a painter, destined for the nl.wikipedia. I've just sent a request for a ticket to OTRS and I've still have to edit over 150 photos in photoshop. And after receiving the ticket, I have to upload them all to the Commons. All this will keep me busy for quite some time. But I'll keep an eye on your work. If you ever need my support, just let me know. JoJan (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you'd like to add some specific help, how about here and here? Cheers, --Jwinius (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]