Talk:Chichibu Railway 6000 series

Japan: Trains Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:07, May 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Trains in Japan descendant WikiProject.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Trains: in Japan Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Trains in Japan.

Have a proposition[edit]

The series articles for Chichibu Railway are too short to constitute a distinct piece, then I offer to unify them into one article.--A Japanologist (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are broken links[edit]

Should be removed the unnecessary link. If you want provide a link, make the page that the link represents.--A Japanologist (talk) 04:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to the two (currently) red links to Seibu 101 series and Seibu 10000 series, then you should read the guidelines, which say: "In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there exists no candidate article, or article section, under any name." As these are both links to articles that are likely to be created in the near future, there is no problem here. --DAJF (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DAJF!

Read the section of Avoiding creation of certain types of red links in Wipedia:Red link.

You had better not make red link without reason.--A Japanologist (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it. It says "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created". Why do you think the article for Seibu 101 series will never be created? It is a major EMU type operated by Seibu, and I personally intend to create an article in the near future, so there's really no need to be so concerned about it. --DAJF (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then make a article in a few days. Improve the each shining hour! Good by.--A Japanologist (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]