Talk:Charles Stimson (lawyer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment[edit]

Couldn't rate at B, because it doesn't cover much outside 2 years of his life, B needs "a majority of the material needed for a completed article." Nicely written prose, but needs even more wikilinks and a bit of rephrasing. The "These comments are in direct contradiction to longstanding American legal tradition" bit needs to be rearranged so the emphasis is on the quotes of the legal scholars; currently it sounds like we're saying that. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

revert -- see talk[edit]

I am reverting these edits. I found this one the most troubling. Excising wikipedian asserted it wasn't relevant to Stimson, and wasn't sourced.

I dispute that the connection to Stimson wasn't sourced. I've quoted the passage in the reference.

I dispute that the connection to Stimson wasn't relevant. Stimson was the responsible for DETAINEE AFFAIRS. His comments on this controversy, if he had chosen to make some, would have been highly relevant. And his decision not to comment was just as relevant.

I also fixed the excising wikipedian's reference to the Heritage Foundation. Please don't use bare inline references. They are very inconvenient for other wikipedians, if the bare reference is taken offline. References remain valid, and should not be removed, just because they are taken offline -- provided the reference provides information like that date of publication, title, name of publication that would provide a dedicated reader to look up a paper copy.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands, the use of the phrase "albeit equivocally" is POV language - it is Wikipedia saying that the apology was equivocal. Can you re-word the sentence so that it says that others were reported to say that they considered the apology equivocal? The later passage about insincerity works in those terms. FWIW, I agree entirely that the apology was equivocal - it's a question of how to present it to conform to BLP. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edited Article[edit]

Put plainly, this article was a hack job on the subject. I have heavily edited this article to remove the more offending portions that wildly violate WP:POV and coatrack portions as well. I have left most of the cites, but I have also removed the subject's campaign contribution history (violation of privacy) and a photo.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charles Stimson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Stimson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_Stimson_(lawyer)&oldid=1206886978"