Talk:Chantry, Suffolk
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Chantry Park missing[edit]
There ought to be a seperate article for Chantry Park. I always thought that Chantry was within Ipswich rather than just within Suffolk. There are seperate articles for Christchurch and Holywells parks, and Chantry is probably bigger in size than those.
It would be nice to have an article listing all the parks or green spaces in Ipswich, as as well as the big parks mentioned above there are a large number of smaller parks. There is also the large Rushmere Heath and the smaller Bixley Heath which are now effectively within Ipswich due to housebuilding.
According to a happiness survey Ipswich is the 3rd. happiest place in Britain, and I think this is due to the large amount of green space due to the many parks. Thanks to the wealthy Victorian businessmen who apparantly competed with each other in giving parkland to the public around the turn of the 19th/20th. centuries. I wish this tradition could become more widespread as with the increasing population of England and greater crowding it is needed. 92.29.112.109 (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chantry, Suffolk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425091051/http://www.sdbc.org.uk/sdbcfs.html to http://www.sdbc.org.uk/sdbcfs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)