Talk:Cartonera

Point of view

This article has been tagged as having a slanted point of view in part because there has only really been one academic book written on the subject. There have, however, been articles in various respectable journals and newspapers, not to mention YouTube videos, blogs, and other sources. This is a grass roots social movement and so, naturally, the more “respectable” sources are a little bit hard to find. It is important that other voices are cited and included in this article. In the interest of full disclosure, I worked closely with the collection of cartonera books at the University of Wisconsin while I was a graduate student. There is no doubt in my mind that the topic of this article is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I also recognize that it there is plenty of work to be done here. giso6150 (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cartonera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120202215428/http://regiacartonera.blogspot.com/2010/08/regia-cartonera-en-san-luis-potosi.html to http://regiacartonera.blogspot.com/2010/08/regia-cartonera-en-san-luis-potosi.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)