Talk:Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Carmelite Sisters of the Aged and InfirmCarmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm – The Sisters' official site http://www.carmelitesisters.com/ calls themselves "for". AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Support. Speedy move. Please contact an admin. There is no need to vote on this!--Asteriontalk 10:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support to be consistent with their own website, but a redirect is needed for the other term, since they seem to be used interchangeably even in Carmelite publications.And yes, there IS a need to vote on this.Edison 13:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

Thus any search for the "OF" usage should get a redirect to the "For" listing. There are 74 Google hits for "Carmelite Sisters of the Aged and Infirm" and 524 ghits for "Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm"Edison 13:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]