This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
A fact from Byzantine studies appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 964 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This is a pretty interesting article, but it needs more sources in the body. Somewildthingsgo (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Thanks for the suggestion. It's a brand new article, so hopefully with time we can build on the citations. Dr.K. (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've flagged this article as one that could use cleanup. It's got a lot of good information, but reads like a huge block of text. It could benefit a little attention from someone who is both familiar with the subject matter (I am not) and the Manual of Style. I've replaced some bullets with subheadings to help with the formatting a bit, but I still think an article with this much good information can be taken further in terms of formatting. Fogster (talk) 00:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]