Talk:Business valuation/Archives/2012

Keeping NPOV on this page: Economists, Financiers, Accountants all have a say

I added back in several references that were inexplicably deleted from a previous version. All the deleted entries were written by non-accountants. I also noted some very specific references to sub-subsets of the accounting profession in the current version.

I suggest that Economists, Financiers, and Accountants all have a say in "valuation" and it is inappropriate to exclude the organizations, published works, etc. from any of them in Wikipedia.

Again, persistent attempts to remove non-accountant resources from this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Physitsky (talk • contribs) 09:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Panderson1959 (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Panderson1959

External links

Before adding external links to valuation consultant websites, please consult external link guidelines to see how if qualifies as well as conflict of interest guidelines and SPAM guildelines.

5. Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use the "ISBN" linking format, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources.

6. Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.

14. Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked from an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep-linked.

15. Lists of links to manufacturers and suppliers.

Montco (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)