Talk:Bottineau LRT

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep/merge.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. The editor who added the request suggests the following:

add a geographic map

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Infobox / New Map[edit]

I'd like to add an infobox; that could significantly clean up this article. But, the existing alternatives map doesn't fit in a standard rail line infobox. Should I create a second map of the current planned alternative and use that, or should I just leave it out of the infobox entirely? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. "box_width = auto" solves my problem. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Line Names[edit]

We know as of August 2011 that the lines will be known by their color names in the near future, before Central opens. However, I don't think it's constructive to randomly refer to Hiawatha as "Blue Line" and Central as "Green Line" while Metro Transit, the Metro Council, and all other local sources are still advertising them as "Hiawatha Line" and "Central Corridor". I added parenthetical references to their current names in the first paragraph but think this should be addressed more accurately. Furthermore, why call Hiawatha "Blue Line" and Central "Green Line" while still calling Southwest "Southwest"? Southwest will be a Green Line extension, and at this point it's officially on the map for the color-scheme names as the green line anyway, so if Hiawatha and Central are referred by color Southwest should be too. I understand that Bottineau has not reached the LPA stage and as such we don't know whether it will be light rail (and hence a Blue Line extension) or BRT (and hence some other color), so it's appropriate to continue referring to it by its AA name. But can't we come up with a less confusing approach than randomly switching all references of Hiawatha and Central to color names while leaving everything else with project names?

Talindsay (talk) 14:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Southwest Corridor (Minneapolis-Saint Paul) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bottineau LRT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150209085805/http://bottineautransitway.org/library/maps_and_alignments/alts_to_be_studied_in_draft_EIS.jpg to http://www.bottineautransitway.org/library/maps_and_alignments/alts_to_be_studied_in_draft_EIS.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bottineau LRT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]