Talk:Boletus abruptibulbus

Boletus abruptibulbus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 18, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 1, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Boletus abruptibulbus, Leccinum arenicola, and Phylloporus arenicola are the only North American Boletaceae mushrooms that grow in coastal sand dunes?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boletus abruptibulbus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 08:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've had a read now, obviously pretty good, but some quibbles Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead seems a little short at just over three lines, even for a relatively small article. Nothing else worth mentioning there? Also, with so few words, should be able to avoid repeat of "known".

Added a couple of sentences, and removed a "known". Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The specific epithet abruptibulbus refers to the shape of the bulb at the base of the stem — what does the abrupti- part of the specific name mean?

Added. Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The cap margin is curved inward when young, but becomes curved downward when mature. — any way to avoid repeat of "curved"?

Now "bent". Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a "pleasant" odor — not sure about the quote marks, is it pleasant or not?

Hmm, I tend to put words that are subjective opinions in quote marks, but I suppose it doesn't lose anything without. Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The stem is solid (i.e., not hollow) — stating the obvious?

Not sure if it's quite that obvious: normally, the word means "firm" or "stable"; in mycological jargon it specifically means "a stem that is not hollow". Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A dilute solution (12%) of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) — I'd much prefer ammonia (NH3) solution, since less than one percent of the dissolved ammonia is in the form you give, see the ammonium hydroxide article

I changed it to "A drop of dilute ammonia (as a 12% NH₄OH solution) placed", as the source says "With 12% of aqueous solution of ammonia (NH₄OH)", does this work? Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer it without the dubious formula, but no big deal Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

mounted in a dilute potassium hydroxide — can you mount something in a solution?

Sounds odd, but it's standard usage. I linked this to Microscope slide#Mounting to clarify. Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5–7.2 µm, 7.2–9 µm — unless there is a reason why one end of the range is less accurate than the other, should be 5.0-7.2 and 7.2-9.0

The source gives them this way, but I suspect it's just poor copyediting on their part, as their ± errors are a minimum of 2 sig figs. Added zeros. Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

relatively unique — ???

Changed to "distinctive". Thanks for reviewing! Sasata (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that was fairly painless
GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: