Talk:Blame It on Rio/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Film
If this film, Blame It On Rio was shot in 1983 or 1984, then Michelle Johnson was not 17 when she appeared nude. Based on this Wikipedia article, she was born in 1965. Therefore, she would of been either 18 or 19 at the time, which makes her of legal age to appear nude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.45.216 (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- As she was born in 1965, her 18th birthday was in 1983. IMDb says the film was shot in March 1983, which I guess was before her 18th birthday. However, your use of the term “of legal age to appear nude” is meaningless. At any rate I am going to delete the uncited trivia from the article. --Mathew5000 (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
The first comment above is specious: Michelle was born on 8 September 1965, thus her 18th birthday was 8 September 1983. The USA release date was 17 February 1984 [1]; assuming post-filming production, editing, plans for marketing, etc. took 5.5 months from the time filming finished, which seems quite plausible, she would have been less than 18 during filming. Agree the related incorrect reasoning should be deleted from the article.Ruck68 (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
child porn?
If she was less than 18, is this child porn or pedophilia is some countries? If it is child porn, should there be an article in Wikipedia? I think it is ok because it is a mainstream film and not a porno film.