Talk:Bint Jbeil

I would suggest removing the "Miscelleneous" section from this page since it seems inappropriate to me. If anyone disagrees please let me know. If not I will remove it.

Jazzman 23:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, go ahead.

--BazDM 17:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I disagree. The reason that it is important to keep it in in my view is that it allows those who are searching for it by name (which of course is how we use wikipedia) to find it.--Epeefleche 23:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the reason you put all those alternative names, then I suggest removing them from the artical and simply making REDIRECT pages for each alternative. That way no one will have to see all those names in the actual article but if somebody searches for the artical by one of those alternative names he will be automatically redirected to the Bint Jbeil article. What do you say? --Jazzman 00:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I allready created the REDIRECT pages myself and removed the "Miscelleneous" section. --Jazzman 18:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bint Jbeil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]