Talk:Billboard Brasil

Brazil: Arts Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Latin music Mid‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Conflict with WP:Charts[edit]

I understand that this magazine is a new development; if this is indeed a legitimate chart, please explain how this differs from the version of the chart with the same name that is listed at WP:Charts as a deprecated chart that is not allowed at Wikipedia. If this passes muster, please post a suggestion on the Wikipedia talk:Record charts page that the disclaimer there needs to be amended to note that it is only songs claiming to have charted there prior to the inception of this new chart that are not allowed. Please cite references in English. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It differs simply because Brazil Hot 100/Hot100Brasil is a "non-notable chart with dubious methodology" , which used a Billboard-like name to promote charting (although as a Brazilian person I could say the charts there were reliable). Billboard Brasil, however, is an official publication by Billboard, so I think there's no doubt this is legit. The magazine has a website, I don't know yet if that page is going to keep older charts for future reference, but we can use the physical magazines just the same. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 19:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victão, thanks for your response. I'm not challenging the veracity of the chart (I don't know enough about it to do so), but I am saying that in order to amend the guideline at WP:Charts that explicitly states a chart of that name is not to be trusted, we need a WP:Reliable source to cite for that absolute 180 change. If we do not amend the guideline at WP:Charts, then a lot of editors are going to be removing the presumably legitimate current and future references to that chart from article space and cite as their justification that WP:Charts guideline. As this is the English language Wiki, an English language source is what is needed to prevent that from English-speaking editors. Abrazame (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whats with these Charts? http://www.hot100brasil.com/ Its online since 1998. --SmoLu (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billboard Brasil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]