Talk:Bell Records

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I do not see the reason why this entry was changed to a disambiguation page. While the first two Bell Records labels do not appear to be significant in the history of recording, putting each label on a separate page does not serve any good purpose, and the person who took this action did not redirect the (now broken) links to their appropriate pages. This is an inconvenience to the reader, who may now have to look at three wrong pages before finding the right one, and in any case must take at least one extra, unnecessary step to find their information. I believe this breakup should be undone, and the single-entry page restored. Zephyrad 13:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a merger of the 1950s-70s Bell Records article with the UK Bell Records article with the merged article called "Bell Records" with links at the top to the two earlier Bell labels. See [1] Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The changes are now completed. Steelbeard1 (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bell Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]