Talk:Balcerowicz Plan

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism[edit]

"# Act of Monetary Return, freezing the exchange of Polish currency while maintaining a high level of inflation."

There can be little doubt that the Balcerowicz plan led to such a situation, but no one wants to slit their own throat. This is an important historical article, in my opinion. The reforms remain to this day controversial. Maybe few native English speakers know what the Balcerowicz plan was but the educated know what "shock therapy" was. To state that it was a deliberate attempt to screw oneself is both misinformative and stupid beyond belief. This is not a well known subject, but it is a controversial one, and it is easily subject to vandalism. Pay attention. Who is looking after the quality of Polish articles except for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.115.97.180 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Average unemployment rate since 1992[edit]

Since there is a text about growth since 1992, perhaps a kind soul would calculate average unemployment rate since 1992?

Data is here[1] --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove sourced and valid information[edit]

Please don't remove sourced and valid information-the other user has based his edits on reliable sources, I see no reason why we should remove them.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Cambridge University Press source is fine. The rest is just polemics and politicians' opinions (do we seriously want to put up Lepper as a contrast to Balcerowicz?). Some of it violates WP:FRINGE. The whole edit is just one big exercise in POV pushing.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Effects and NPOV[edit]

There are a lot of non-neutral and disputable statements in the Effects section. Unemployment in Poland has risen drastically over 10-15 years, and the article is implying that it was just previous hidden unemployment, and attributing bankruptcies and unemployment to the reforms to some "widespread perception". However, the truth is that many people have lost their jobs. BeŻet (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]