This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
I'm at a loss as to why a search for "awesome" brings up this page. Shouldn't this at least be a disambiguation page, with a short definition of the word's most common english usage and a link to this article, which should be moved to Awesome (game)? - Jersykotalk 15:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
i agree. It was probably some person who thought people who say "oh no you di-ent" are "weird". Whatever, kidies to whoever changed it back to normal.
No, people who say "dumb-dumb" are not stupid. People who say "kidies" are silly.
With so many people termanating this page, shouldn't they go to jail? aydan bahe 23:08, 11, march, 2008
I agree, this really seems like it should be locked in a locked locker.
I second that. I just had to remove vandalism that had been inserted by some 14-year old or other into the article with the purposeful reason to vandalize it for the usual non-existent, juvenile reasons. Article should be locked instantly to prevent further repeated defacement. 83.140.239.143 (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Offhand, I'd say the level of vandalism on the article doesn't warrant page protection. Tabercil (talk) 17:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
