Talk:Auxílio Brasil

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Auxílio Brasil article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Brazil: Government and laws Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Disagree with the change to the present tense[edit]

@Pppery:, hey! I really don't know when I'll have time to update Auxílio Brasil and Bolsa Família again, in both Portuguese and English, but the new government headed by Lula has already moved the program to the latter.

Although both of them are social welfare programs, Bolsa Família requires that kids of families enrolled in this program are properly vaccinated, among other things. Source in Portuguese. So both articles require updates and cleanups, something that takes a bit of time (which I should have by June), but I believe it's a mistake to say this program still exists. Tetizeraz - (talk page) 02:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right, my edit there was poorly thought-out. What happened was that I was reading Bolsa Família, which said "is the current program" and then had a paragraph in the lead announcing the discontinuation but nothing about the revival, which was self-contradictory, and I corrected the contradiction (wrongly) by making the lead match the last paragraph, and then went to this article and did the same even though there was no contradiction. I've now tagged that article with {{update}} and reverted all of my content changes. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! :) Tetizeraz - (talk page) 12:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]