This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
Hiya - NACADEMIC gives us, "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources" and while people often use a high citation count to assert notability, it's not actually what passes us through WP:GNG - "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If you feel strongly, by all means remove the tag - but more sourcing in mainstream RS for Vaswani would be at least helpful, IMHO. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sakchy for adding reliable sources. It's always good to have more sources but passing GNG is not necessary, as NACADEMIC says "failure to meet either the general notability guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant if an academic is notable under this guideline". Enervation (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]