Talk:Asghar Bukhari

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on July 2015.

ASGHAR BUKHARI (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)
Mpacuk Asghar (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)
Chetch the Letch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (declared here)
Chech the letch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=Chech+the+letch)

Untitled[edit]

Can anyone editing this page recently, please enter into a conversation with me, as I would like to sort out any differences we have. Currently I feel the changes have had a slight bias and new material added by myself has all been referenced, so it should be good to stand. However feel free to explain why you disagree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bladerunner786 (talk • contribs) 09:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attack claim?[edit]

I looked at the article, possibly too quickly, but I'm not seeing what would constitute an attack. Can someone enlighten me?--SPhilbrick T 22:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into this The page barely has a few lines about the university, etc... followed by more than 30 lines of controversy. It did not give any biographical information, and seems to have been created primarily for the Controvorsy section. There is hardly the other side of the picture, or anything else to offer in this article aside from controversy and "attacks". After refernces, there seem to be extrapolations without any backups, as well as whole paragraphs about Irving. To summarise, poor linking, extrapolations, lack of content, single sided - mainly controversy, goes off on tangent talking about other people, etc... Thanks again Asifkhanj (talk) 22:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern about the relative weight on controversy versus other aspects. However, CSD is for blatant cases, and I don't see this as blatant, especially as much of the material is referenced. (I didn't track down the references, but I don't see any claim that the information is not supported by the references.)

If you feel that the article should be removed, consider filing an AfD, where the merits can be debated. The results of an AfD discussion are not always simply keep or delete, it can be the case that editors decide to remove the more egregious problems, or push for more balance. --SPhilbrick T 22:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update Required[edit]

This page needs updating, requires more discussion.

Mpac00 (talk) 11:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this page is out of date, i'll search for more content to put in. AanikaM (talk) 11:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updates/Reversion[edit]

Please discuss before changing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asifkhanj (talk • contribs) 16:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:NPOV before making further edits; articles must present all facets, both positive and negative. Plot Spoiler (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did review it, and with my changes, I think it does give it an impartial tone, and balance, Can you pinpoint which areas are of concern to you before you do the wholesale reverts. Asifkhanj (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section[edit]

The entire body of this article is 'Controversy'! Is there anyone who is familiar with the subject of the article who can sort this out? Shiningroad (talk) 06:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asghar Bukhari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011101342/http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=181 to http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=181

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]