Talk:Argentine Regional Workers' Federation

A fact from Argentine Regional Workers' Federation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 January 2008 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the anarcho-syndicalist Argentine Workers' Federation was the country's first national labor confederation?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/January.

Wikipedia

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Argentine Regional Workers' Federation, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

🚨🚨 Join our active cleanup drive for the month of May – all are invited 🚨🚨

Good article nominees

03 May 2024 – Mariano R. Vázquez (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Peer reviews

01 Mar 2024 – Gaetano Bresci (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

08 May 2024 – Draft:Cherepanov, Donat Andreevich (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c)
05 May 2024 – Draft:No Pasarán!: Antifascist Dispatches from a World in Crisis (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Fianticolonial (t · c)
undated – Draft:Grass Roots Books (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC
05 May 2024 – Draft:Mirna Wabi-Sabi (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Overlookedn (t · c) was deleted

Cleanup (350) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (506)

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Last paragraph:

The article claims that the FORA V was dissolved, yet it still exists. This should be clarified. Oblivioid (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Yeah I agree. I know for a fact it still exists. I think this page should be updated to reflect that and in the anarchist spirit I know I
 should do it myself, but don't see myself with the time to do it. This page was probably created by one person and hopefully they could look 
 into it and fix this issue. XXVII (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which was it?[edit]

This article says that it was FORA who could not afford sending a delegate to London, but in the meeting's article it says it was CORA. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 02:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]