Talk:Archean life in the Barberton Greenstone Belt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Review By Stephen Reed[edit]

  • Intro
  • The intro discusses the big picture and why this subject is important which is good, but I think that you could probably shave off a sentence of why its important or make it a little more discriptive of the topic.
  • Global beginnings of life
  • the abiogenic link doesn't work
  • Tectonic History
  • I think that you could probably condense these first two sections into one or maybe switch the order, your talking about the correlation of life between your area and australia in the first then later see that these areas were once the same area in a supercontinent.
  • Evidence for life
  • Maybe try to tie this in more to the big picture, because I got lost but that's probably because I have no background on the area.
  • Fossil Record
  • We get an overall picture of how these rocks contian fossils, try to tie that into the specific area a little bit more.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreed16 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Jensen's Review[edit]

1. Since the term "abiogenic" does not have a working link in the "Global beginnings of life" section, maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to give a brief explanation of what it is since it's not so obvious. If you really wanted to then you could even make a page for it with a very brief description.

2. Maybe it wouldn't hurt to add another picture, perhaps in the tectonic history part, in order to give the reader a better understanding.

3. I think the "Evidence for life" section was done really well with the list.

4. Everything else looks pretty good, except that some of the terms can be linked to other pages still. For example, "Onverwacht" can be linked to "Onverwacht series." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjense2 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Kirst's Review[edit]

Corey, after reading through your page I honestly couldn't find one major mistake or problem! Other than a link that didn't click, I thought you did a Good job! I really like how you organized your page and gave it a direction. You start with tectonic history, then get into the meat and potatoes in evidence for life, and finish with future applications. Obviously you had to withhold much of what you know and will do in the future regarding this study and taking that into consideration your page may not be in it's finest form but its pretty close! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgkirst (talk • contribs) 14:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"hostile early earth"[edit]

Of course life didn't evolve in a "hostile" early earth. The editor may have been feeling that an atmosphere lacking free oxygen would be hostile to a Wikipedian editor.--Wetman (talk) 19:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archean life in the Barberton Greenstone Belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory Information[edit]

This article appears to contradict itself concerning the occurrence of microfossils in igneous formations.

"4. True microfossils should occur in a geologically plausible context (for example, there are no microfossils in igneous rock, because life cannot grow in molten lava).

Fossil record

The oldest microfossils from the Barberton Greenstone belt are found in the Onverwacht Group, specifically, in both the Kromberg and Hooggenoeg Formations.[1] Both of these formations are predominantly igneous rock; ... "

Mandilion (talk) 17:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Louisiana State University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Archean_life_in_the_Barberton_Greenstone_Belt&oldid=1198916681"