Talk:April Showers (2009 film)

Citations in the lead[edit]

24 citations is certainly a reasonable number for one sentence!163.160.107.179 (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really not sure why it had so many so I just kept one. Joetri10 (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It might have been a poor way to indicate the film's notability. In any case, a lot of these references could be used to expand the article, so it's worth noting this prior revision having the list of them. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you might be correct so here are all of the (still working) citations from the previous edit if anyone wishes to rinse through them for additionally relevant information: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Joetri10 (talk) 00:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks for listing. :) Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 00:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on April Showers (2009 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013124001/http://www.aprilshowersmovie.com:80/ to http://www.aprilshowersmovie.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]