Talk:Aphaena submaculata

Aphaena submaculata has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 24, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Aphaena submaculata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Aphaena submaculata (pictured) uses specialized mouthparts to suck the sap of trees?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aphaena submaculata.

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 06:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Aphaena submaculata/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Etriusus (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Starting review shortly. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

entomologist Frederick William Hope. Forgot to link "e"

Done

was first scientifically described Does this species have multiple scientific descriptions?

Done, rrworded

Simultaneous => Around the same time or something like that.

Done

the tegmina are a dull red. red what?

Done

Size of Aphaena submaculata burmanica?

Done

Is that you could find on behavior and distribution?

Unfortunately, yes. I've done a handful of planthoppers and they tend to not get much love in source coverage.

Can you add more references see here

Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects - a very brief mention regarding vein patterns, I elected not to add this since it would be way to technical/not concise
'From Volume 21'- this is just a repeat of the Fauna of Nepal source, the latter is more direct
'Nomenclatural changes in the suborders Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) and Paleorrhyncha (Palaeohemiptera)' -unable to find a non-pay walled version
'Catalogo das especies americanas de Laternariidae:(Homoptera; Fulgoroidea)' - unable to find any mention of the species, this just seems to be a basic list of nomenclature histories, and an outdated one at that.

Very well prepared article. Had little to complain about and would like to see this article promoted to GA soon. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 09:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine XI:, that should be everything. Thanks for the review. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 22:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 03:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Aphaena submaculata

... that Aphaena submaculata (pictured) uses specialized mouthparts to suck the sap of trees? Source:https://www.eol.org/pages/240678 and https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Aphaena-submaculata-Duncan-1843-from-Dhankuta-Nepal_fig1_355097163
- Reviewed:
- Comment: ~~2nd QPQ forthcoming~~

Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 21 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🏵️Etrius ( Us) 01:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQs are done. All set. Thriley (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Etriusus and Thriley: I added the image to the nomination and will promote. Lightburst (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]