Talk:Angels and Demons at Play

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Copyvio[edit]

Most of this was copied from the Saturn Web discography, which itself borrows from Robert Campbell's 1993 discography. Rather than copy this text wholesale, it should be used as a reference (granted, the website was already listed under "References").

I've removed the content in question and started some re-work. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology[edit]

Personally I think Ra's discography should be chronological around the last recording date (not the first), so Jazz by Sun Ra starts the list. That would place Angels and Demons in amongst the series recorded at Hall Recording Company. Everything starts to get really complicated otherwise. Deep purple being a good example of an album that should come first otherwise. I've tried to work out release dates as a chronological alternative, but there simply isn't enough information. Any opinions???Franciselliott (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any objections, if you think it's easier to maintain and follow that way. (I figured I'd start a new section since this isn't about the copyvio.) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]