Talk:And Then We Danced

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Georgia (country)

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Pro-russian groups[edit]

@Aranya: there is a definite source highlighting connection of pro-russian groups to the protests - if there is a relevant source claiming a connection there is no , could you please WP:NPOV isn't applicable.--Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aleqsandrebadridze: Thank you for reverting to a previous version. There was another edit (specifically this one) that came into question when reverting to the previous version. – Aranya (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is interpressnews a neutral/good source? It's used for nearly all the sources in that section. Ideally some other (neutral) news outlets should be used, where possible. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is the best possible source in English language. It is a news agency like Reuters, and usually is quite accurate. Also, the facts sourced by interpressnews are merely just facts and I don't think they might have any interest to corrupt facts. There is also BBC news report, but interpressnews was more uptime.--Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal media and politicians try to put label of pro-russian on the protesting groups. The fact there are sources saying these groups are pro-russian doesn't mean they are pro-russian indeed, considering that leaders of these groups say they are against Russian policies. You can mention in the article that some people refer to the protesters as pro-russian, but right now article breaks WP:NPOV rule and needs edit. —ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might have been right, but your reading of WP:NPOV is totally wrong: look at the rule more accurately, there is an entire part WP:WEIGHT. Hundred of internationally recognized sources (Reuters for examples), NGO reports, Georgian outlets highlight connections with Russian authorities and their pro-russian views. In case of Lortkipanidze, he is the head of a Yevgeny Primakov Foundation based in Russia, funded by Russia and named after a KGB spy. In this case your argument about neutrality simply doesn't apply, just as the argument of "flat earth" doesn't apply to Earth article. --Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Award nomination[edit]

32nd GLAAD Media Awards

---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]