Talk:Amta I
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amta I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721153412/http://kolkata.bsnl.co.in/stdadjacent.shtml to http://kolkata.bsnl.co.in/stdadjacent.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Amta 1 CD Blocks[edit]
Please don't delete my edits. I'm collecting info about all the villages from my mom. শৌমেন মান্না (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- For all information uploaded in Wikipedia, other readers MUST be able to verify whether the information provided is correct or bogus. if you are eager to continue in Wikipedia you MUST add reliable sources to whatever information you are adding. Individuals, however brilliant, are not considered reliable sources, Authentic published materials are considered reliable. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 16:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)