Talk:America Live with Megyn Kelly

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

News or commentary[edit]

America Live should be termed as a "commentary/opinion" program rather than a "news" program, given Megyn Kelly's right-of-center analysis of events. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.85.10.60 (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but is she not capable of at least playing Devil's Advocate? I can always tell the political leanings of self-described news program anchors, it's part of being human. I believe the format of this show is news, while Beck's is definitely commentary. †TE†Talk 09:05, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly does provide her opinion on the constitutionality and legal precedence on certain issues, so perhaps the program is a mix of both news and commentary. That said, her political affiliations or lack thereof probably shouldn't be discussed in this article, seeing as how the subject of the article is the program and not the host of the program. I'm no expert, so I won't make any edits myself. That is just my opinion. RHM22 (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

I'll see what I can find. †TE†Talk 08:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]