Talk:Ainulindalë/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 14:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No images to review. The Grey Book citation seems less than ideal, but per this page it's peer-reviewed, even if some of the material is submitted by undergraduates. The author appears to be a physics undergrad in this case. The material quoted is straightforward interpretation; I'm not sure this would survive at FAC, though. Sources are otherwise reliable and Earwig finds nothing but a few backward copied sentences.

Noted.

'Marjorie Burns, who worked on the different versions of the "Ainulindalë"': what does "worked on" mean? I think "studied" would be better if that's the intended meaning.

Fixed.

Suggest combining the last two paras to avoid having one-sentence paragraphs.

-- That's everything. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]