Talk:Academic Gymnasium Danzig

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools High‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Academic Gymnasium Danzig appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 537 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Academic Gymnasium Danzig, along with similar schools in Elbing and Thorn, transformed Royal Prussia into a center of classical studies in the 16th century?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/May.

Wikipedia

Comments[edit]

I knew that this edit would happen sooner or later, and that no actual content would be added. -- Matthead Discuß 03:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since those places belonged to Poland then, I am surprised that you are surprised. Tymek (talk) 01:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abolished before creation of Germany[edit]

It was abolished before Germany was founded, is there Prussian history stub ? It would be more precise. --Molobo (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help i.e. "(Hanov(ious), "[edit]

Made an edit to this article and an error mess came back for something that I did not change and wondering how it should be resolved? Should it be " (Hanov[ious]), "?GinAndChronically (talk) 16:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]