Talk:4-Methylethcathinone

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about 4-Methylethcathinone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled[edit]

You're quick. but why isn't it letting me view the new image you just uploaded unless I am currently in the edit screen previewing the page? ..or is this just me? Enix150 (talk) 07:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: problem fixed itself literally just as I submitted ^that previous entry. Enix150 (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is misleading for nrg-2 page to redirect to methcathinone as there is no evidence or reported user experiences to suggest nrg-? compounds ever contained a cathinone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.115.120 (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]