Talk:2022 AFC Women's Club Championship

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ref regarding the reschedule[edit]

Hey @Matilda Maniac and @Seany91. The reason I think that the reference is not good is because the same reference is already available in the 'External links' section. As you may see, the reference you provided is not a reference at all, its the competition's main page link itself. Thus basically you are providing the same link in two different places. Instead of adding redundant info its better not to do add anything. What do you think, should we add the link you consider as reference or should we remove it? Anbans 586 (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm consistent in that an imperfect ref is better than no ref at all, especially for a factual statement. And AFAIK the ref is linking to the competition's fixture page showing that the Indian club has been removed. I don't seen an issue with the same ref in multiple places on a page. Seany91 (talk) 21:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]