Talk:2018 Nobel Peace Prize
 | 2018 Nobel Peace Prize has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 1, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Feedback[edit]
- @Litjade: I have reviewed through this article and it seems fine. Sufficient references and content. Thank you for your contributions!!
- Fellow007 (talk) 08:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Fellow007: Thank you for your review and comments. I realize there are a lot of directly quoted passages which, at least for now, help give a sense of the historical moment. Perhaps over time, they can be paraphrased in text and simply added to the quote parameter of their respective citations. I'm stumped, however, regarding images to enhance, illustrate or otherwise support the content. —Litjade (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 Nobel Peace Prize/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: BlackfullaLinguist (talk · contribs) 13:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Excellent article! As it's been almost a year, is there anything else that could be added? I notice there is an 'early reactions' section, are there any 'later reactions' to mention? Any dissent or controversy to mention? If there is nothing new to add, then I think it's good to go! BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for this update! I'll check for additional notable reactions. Meanwhile, I've changed the section title "Early reactions" to "Reactions", moved the nominations paragraph into the "Nobel Committee" section, and reordered the "Nobel Committee" section to last. I could add in the "Laureates' work" section something about the current status of international law on conflict-related sexual violence, since "historic context" was mentioned in the lead section, but that might go beyond the scope of the article. I'd appreciate any advice you might offer. —Litjade (talk) 00:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think you've covered it all, I did some googling to see if there was anything else, but I've come up with nothing. My final note, would be just to go through and blue-link any terms that might need explaining / have their own article - I just linked the 'sexual violence in war...' to the 'Wartime Sexual Violence' article. I can see the article is pretty well linked anywhere, so I'm not sure if there is even anymore, but perhaps read the Style Guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking and if you don't think it needs any more links, then I can't see any reason not to pass it. I know it's low on images..but what kind of public images can one expect of two living people? Perhaps just do a quick search and make sure there is nothing useful, again though, I doubt there will be. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Congratulations @Litjade:! Your article has passed the review! I consider 2018 Nobel Peace Prize to have met all 6 criteria, it is well-written, concise and well linked, verifiable, broad in coverage yet on topic, neutral in it's viewpoint, stable in its content, and sufficiently illustrated. This review has been finalised. Once again, congratulations on your work and thank you for contributing. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- As a side note, bringing the article up to FA standard I would look at that current status in international law idea /but/ only so far as it applies to these two people. Are they part of a larger movement the international community has taken note of? Did this award afford them any publicly recorded opportunities to speak or present on the topic? Have they gained anything that we can tie directly to their award winning? Again, all those points are beyond 'Good Article' and move into 'A' and 'Featured Article' criteria, so not pertinent for GA I think, but still something to think about for any user wishing to progress this article further. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Congratulations @Litjade:! Your article has passed the review! I consider 2018 Nobel Peace Prize to have met all 6 criteria, it is well-written, concise and well linked, verifiable, broad in coverage yet on topic, neutral in it's viewpoint, stable in its content, and sufficiently illustrated. This review has been finalised. Once again, congratulations on your work and thank you for contributing. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think you've covered it all, I did some googling to see if there was anything else, but I've come up with nothing. My final note, would be just to go through and blue-link any terms that might need explaining / have their own article - I just linked the 'sexual violence in war...' to the 'Wartime Sexual Violence' article. I can see the article is pretty well linked anywhere, so I'm not sure if there is even anymore, but perhaps read the Style Guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking and if you don't think it needs any more links, then I can't see any reason not to pass it. I know it's low on images..but what kind of public images can one expect of two living people? Perhaps just do a quick search and make sure there is nothing useful, again though, I doubt there will be. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)