Talk:2007 Finnish campaign finance scandal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Law[edit]

"According to the Ministry of Justice all control is in the responsibility of media and they have no opportunity to punish any politician of any potential bribery cases and/or lack of information.[7] In 2011 the funds have not been opened by all politicians. e.g. Mari Kiviniemi has said that most payments of total 65,991 € are under the obligation to give any public information."

Sorry guys, this might make sense in a Finnish idiom but it's incomprehensible in English. Could it be rewritten to make sense, please?Jatrius (talk) 00:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Should be rewritten. Kyz2 (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trials 2013[edit]

When trials of Ilkka Kanerva 50,000 euros bribes and Nova Goup millions of euros [1] [2][3] [4] started in January - March 2013, and Jyrki Katainen was found to delegate € 700,000 to his friend [5], [6], [7] and Jyrki Katainen and Alexander Stubb used maybe state finance to in my opinion invitations of National Coalition Party in Lapland (party denied, if National Coalition Party paid the costs it is ok) [8], the media was concentrated in €30 benefit Heidi Hautala received from unreported employment when not a MP. As I understood, based on this €30 benefit Heidi Hautala was forced to resign from the commitee against unreported employment. In my opinion she and the greens have been in the statements against the unreported employment more than the other parties. Greens have not appointed the new person yet. Watti Renew (talk) 16:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]