Talk:2007 American League Division Series

Cleveland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Baseball: Angels / Yankees Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Yankees (assessed as High-importance).

Indians Roster[edit]

That's more than 25. Anybody know how and who to split it so there's only the right 25?--AndrewHowse 21:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indians/Yankees Game Summaries[edit]

They were recently changed by a non-user reducing the previously thorough summaries to just a few sentences. Anyone else vote for reverting back to the longer summaries instead of these new 3 sentence summaries? GregX102 14:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]