Talk:2005 International Rules Series

Australia: Australian rules football Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2005 International Rules Series is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Gaelic games

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaelic games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaelic games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gaelic gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic gamesTemplate:WikiProject Gaelic gamesGaelic games articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Does anyone have a source for the Ireland 6, Australia 5, 2 drawn series record? In my understanding, recently series have been decided on aggregate score, so Australia won in 2003. I seem to remember that the same applied in 1998, so Ireland won that series.

A quick Google search seems to confirm my memory, for example: [1] [2] [3] JPD 10:33, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On a different matter, I chaged "rosters" to "squads", as it is definitely the more commonm term for Aussie rules, and I couldn't find any sign that roster was commonly used in Gaelic football either. Correct me if I'm wrong. JPD 10:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The word used in Gaelic Football is 'panel'. --Kgaughan 00:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any particular reason why the Australian players have a space for "role", but the Irish have a space for "position"? JPD 17:47, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea actually... --J L C Leung 21:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=intrules
- In 2005 International Rules Series on 2011-05-25 08:00:54, 404 Not Found
- In 2005 International Rules Series on 2011-06-12 01:54:39, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2005 International Rules Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]