Talk:130 West 30th Street

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

130 West 30th Street
130 West 30th Street

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/130 West 30th Street; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article was 5x expanded in the last 7 days (1590b to 13kb). Article is adequately sourced, neutral, and only pings on Earwigs for properly attributed quotes. Hooks are interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK. QPQ has been completed. Image is properly licensed and used in the article. Morgan695 (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hello @Epicgenius: and thank you for expanding this article! Before passing, I do have one minor concern with the page, which otherwise looks good in terms of DYK requirements. Could you add a citation somewhere in the article that states that the building is eighteen stories? This is in the lede and infobox, but there's no mention in the actual body of the article citing this. Super minor, I know, but it's the kind of thing I like to look out for, and everything else in the lede seems to be well cited in the body. Once this is settled, I have no problem passing ALT1, which I think is the most interesting. Cheers! Johnson524 20:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnson524 and Morgan695: Thanks to both of you for your reviews. I must've forgotten to add a citation for the 18-story detail; this has now been fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Epicgenius: Looks good now! Thank you for your high-quality work on Wikipedia: the article was the most enjoyable read on a building I've seen in awhile 🙂 Johnson524 20:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]