This category is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
There is already "Shipwrecks in the Great Lakes." There is one entry here. Is this category needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doprendek (talk • contribs)
The parent Category:Shipwrecks of the United States is largely split into categories of the form Category:Shipwrecks of the <Name of State> coast, even for other cases such as Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia (U.S. state) coast where there is only one body of water that is associated with them. If this category weren't around, entries that belong here would need to be placed into all three of its parents directly. Carolina wren (talk) 17:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
