User talk:Llammakey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

KSS-III submarine[edit]

Fine, I will re-read the articles/links that you have sent to me previously and I will refer to them, in case of any error on my part. I'll try to see if there are any errors. Please, do not have me blocked. Please revert your complaint from the Administrators' Board. Let's just settle this and make peace. Kishore Editing - 16:75 (IST) 28 January, 2022

RFCN[edit]

RFC/N discussion of the username "Juanpumpchump"[edit]

A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of Juanpumpchump (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. Ed [talk] [OMT] 01:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The ed17 Firstly, I would like to protest that I have been targeted by this person because of my username.
This person felt that they had an issue and that they then had to message me about their "issue" towards it.
I chose the name several years ago and it is because I regularly go clay pidgeon shooting and "pumping rounds" - is a terminology that we use for firing a shotgun.
Nothing else.
I suggest that this person, honestly finds something better to do with their time that be easily offended over nothing.
Juanpumpchump (talk) 09:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link for torpedo not necessary[edit]

There is link on the page for the word torpedo. This does not add to the page, since it is for a list of ships with the same name. rogerd (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not what you put in the edit summary, which was a dab page argument. Llammakey (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant to put that in the article's talk page, not yours. --rogerd (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from edit warring[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Karakurt-class corvette shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MechanoidWarhead (talk) 16:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]