This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
This section needs work. It contains some all caps text and seems to go on some tangential rant. "Draft-dodgers" "Learning through osmosis." I don't know enough about the topic or wikipedia to fix this, but I wanted to alert people that this is not right. --WTesZ0 10:55 Monday, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm reading the original source of the percentage values for Argentina. It's bad. It's a web survey with a sample size of 1000 and parameterized by sex, age, socioeconomic status and location. I can think of several ways this could be biased for a larger percentage number. Data noise, preference toward internet accesibility, publicity reach. This is not a formal study; there is no formal publication. It's Kantar alright, though it was commissioned by the UVA (the Argentine Vegan Union).
This begs to question every other source in this article. This is rock-hard statistics, it necessarily requires the formalisms and thoroughness of proper science. There's a lot of noise in this article and it's seeps out into other sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianKovo (talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]