Talk:Science.gov

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article issues[edit]

Reposting from Help Desk:

In the references section there is a list of external links - can you use those as references for any of the content in the article using tagged references (<ref></ref>)? At the moment most of the inline citations are to the subject's own website and that kind of self reference is not a reliable source.
At the moment I don't think the article shows the "significant coverage in reliable sources" required to establish notability, especially in view of item 1.
This item is really a variation on 1 and 2 above.

– ukexpat (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll look at addressing the concerns.

Slederman (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox would be nice. Kittybrewster ☎ 22:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done – ukexpat (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I've addressed the concerns. Would someone experienced in the ways of Wikipedia please tell me how to get the page reviewed and the warnings lifted?

Slederman (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we are quite there yet. Nearly all of the inline citations are to the subject's website. Can you use any of the external links in the References section as inline citations to support the content of the article? At the moment the reader has to check each such link to see how it is relevant to the article. The links in the References section go some way to establish notability, but is there coverage of the site in any well known journals, newspapers etc that can help in this regard? – ukexpat (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article now has 23 inline citations. Of these, 15 are external to Science.gov and to OSTI. The external links are to noteworthy sources (e.g. UPI, Whitehouse.gov, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Library Journal, Federal Computer Week, and Government Computer News.) I really do believe that I've established noteworthiness.

Slederman (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, thanks for the hard work. – ukexpat (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the education. Slederman (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]