Talk:Christy Walsh case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Needed tidying up due to subjective tone, but sufficiently notable because the first case ever won a third appeal in the Northern Ireland legal system; also because of the 20-year delay in clearing the name of a person wrongly accused of a serious criminal offence. user:Brocach —Preceding undated comment added 23:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

References to "I" and "me" indicate that the latest revisions by user:Diplocksystem are the work of the subject of the article. Needs reversions, or a substantial rewrite, to make it an objective Wikipedia article rather than an extension of Mr Walsh's campaign website. Brocach (talk) 13:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copying material from Christy Walsh's website as a source may explain the reference's to "I" and "me" slipping through, as referred to by user: Brocach, small error on my part.Diplocksystem (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The case does deserve a Wikipedia article, but this version has now strayed so far from a neutral tone that it is in danger of becoming a candidate for deletion. It reads almost as though Christy Walsh himself had written it without first having read WP:SOAP. Brocach (talk) 22:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Christy Walsh case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]